You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A disaggregated biodiversity offset accounting model to improve estimation of ecological equivalency and no net loss
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.016 |
| Authors |
FJF Maseyk, LP Barea, RTT Stephens, HP Possingham, G Dutson, M Maron |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Chile | 1 | 9% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 9% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 26 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 32 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 19% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,192,085
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#2,614
of 6,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,939
of 418,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#45
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.