| Title |
An overview of e-waste management in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10163-014-0256-8 |
| Authors |
Chenyu Lu, Lin Zhang, Yongguang Zhong, Wanxia Ren, Mario Tobias, Zhilin Mu, Zhixiao Ma, Yong Geng, Bing Xue |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 320 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 12% |
| Researcher | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 11% |
| Unknown | 120 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 50 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 47 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 26 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 41 | 13% |
| Unknown | 131 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,866,480
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
#49
of 194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,806
of 229,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.