↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and incidence of COPD in smokers and non-smokers: the Rotterdam Study

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Epidemiology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
206 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
405 Mendeley
Title
Prevalence and incidence of COPD in smokers and non-smokers: the Rotterdam Study
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10654-016-0132-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalie Terzikhan, Katia M. C. Verhamme, Albert Hofman, Bruno H. Stricker, Guy G. Brusselle, Lies Lahousse

Abstract

COPD is the third leading cause of death in the world and its global burden is predicted to increase further. Even though the prevalence of COPD is well studied, only few studies examined the incidence of COPD in a prospective and standardized manner. In a prospective population-based cohort study (Rotterdam Study) enrolling subjects aged ≥45, COPD was diagnosed based on a pre-bronchodilator obstructive spirometry (FEV1/FVC < 0.70). In absence of an interpretable spirometry within the Rotterdam Study, cases were defined as having COPD diagnosed by a physician on the basis of clinical presentation and obstructive lung function measured by the general practitioner or respiratory physician. Incidence rates were calculated by dividing the number of incident cases by the total number of person years of subjects at risk. In this cohort of 14,619 participants, 1993 subjects with COPD were identified of whom 689 as prevalent ones and 1304 cases as incident ones. The overall incidence rate (IR) of COPD was 8.9/1000 person-years (PY); 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) 8.4-9.4. The IR was higher in males and in smokers. The proportion of female COPD participants without a history of smoking was 27.2 %, while this proportion was 7.3 % in males. The prevalence of COPD in the Rotterdam Study is 4.7 % and the overall incidence is approximately 9/1000 PY, with a higher incidence in males and in smokers. The proportion of never-smokers among female COPD cases is substantial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 405 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 404 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 16%
Student > Bachelor 60 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 7%
Researcher 26 6%
Other 58 14%
Unknown 137 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 3%
Other 44 11%
Unknown 155 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,064,531
of 25,603,577 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#158
of 1,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,937
of 313,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,603,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.