↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Children and Life Satisfaction

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Happiness Studies, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Erratum to: Children and Life Satisfaction
Published in
Journal of Happiness Studies, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10902-010-9196-8
Authors

Luis Angeles

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 25%
Unknown 6 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 2 25%
Unknown 6 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2010.
All research outputs
#2,129,494
of 25,303,733 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Happiness Studies
#274
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,573
of 100,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Happiness Studies
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,303,733 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.