↓ Skip to main content

Primary ciliary dyskinesia presentation in 60 children according to ciliary ultrastructure

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Primary ciliary dyskinesia presentation in 60 children according to ciliary ultrastructure
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00431-013-1996-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christelle Vallet, Estelle Escudier, Françoise Roudot-Thoraval, Sylvain Blanchon, Brigitte Fauroux, Nicole Beydon, Michèle Boulé, Anne Marie Vojtek, Serge Amselem, Annick Clément, Aline Tamalet

Abstract

Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is an inherited disease related to ciliary dysfunction, with heterogeneity in clinical presentation and in ciliary ultrastructural defect. Our study intended to determine if there are phenotypic differences in patients with PCD based on ciliary ultrastructural abnormality. In this retrospective study carried out among 60 children with a definitive diagnosis of PCD, we analyzed clinical, radiological, and functional features at diagnosis and at last recorded visit, according to cilia defect (absence of dynein arms: DAD group, n = 36; abnormalities of the central complex: CCA group, n = 24). Onset of respiratory symptoms occurred later in the CCA than in the DAD group (9.5 versus 0.5 months, p = 0.03). Situs inversus was only observed in the DAD group, while respiratory disease in siblings were more frequent in the CCA group (p = 0.003). At diagnosis, clinical presentation was more severe in the CCA group: frequency of respiratory tract infections (p = 0.008), rhinosinusitis (p = 0.02), otitis complications (p = 0.0001), bilateral bronchiectasis (p = 0.04), and number of hypoxemic patients (p = 0.03). Pulmonary function remained stable in both groups, but outcome was better in the CCA than in the DAD group: less antibiotic therapy and hypoxemic patients (p = 0.004). In conclusion, our results underlined the relationship between the severity of clinical presentation and the ultrastructural ciliary defect.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 15%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2013.
All research outputs
#13,149,957
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#2,268
of 3,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,497
of 199,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#15
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.