↓ Skip to main content

Useful animal models for the research of osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
Title
Useful animal models for the research of osteoarthritis
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00590-013-1205-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kalliopi Lampropoulou-Adamidou, Pavlos Lelovas, Eleftherios V. Karadimas, Chrysoula Liakou, Ioannis K. Triantafillopoulos, Ismene Dontas, Nikolaos A. Papaioannou

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a major cause of suffering for millions of people. Investigating the disease directly on humans may be challenging. The aim of the present study is to investigate the advantages and limitations of the animal models currently used in OA research. The animal models are divided into induced and spontaneous. Induced models are further subdivided into surgical and chemical models, according to the procedure used to induce OA. Surgical induction of OA is the most commonly used procedure, which alters the exerted strain on the joint and/or alter load bearing leading to instability of the joint and induction of OA. Chemical models are generated by intra-articular injection of modifying factors or by systemically administering noxious agents, such as quinolones. Spontaneous models include naturally occurring and genetic models. Naturally occurring OA is described in certain species, while genetic models are developed by gene manipulation. Overall, there is no single animal model that is ideal for studying degenerative OA. However, in the present review, an attempt is made to clarify the most appropriate use of each model.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 257 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 17%
Student > Bachelor 25 10%
Researcher 19 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 79 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 16%
Engineering 26 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 18 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 6%
Other 49 19%
Unknown 88 34%