You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The challenges and opportunities in cumulative effects assessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Impact Assessment Review, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.eiar.2016.06.008 |
| Authors |
Melissa M. Foley, Lindley A. Mease, Rebecca G. Martone, Erin E. Prahler, Tiffany H. Morrison, Cathryn Clarke Murray, Deborah Wojcik |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pakistan | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Sweden | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 208 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Unknown | 50 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 86 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 70 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2022.
All research outputs
#5,284,655
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Impact Assessment Review
#162
of 770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,294
of 428,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Impact Assessment Review
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.