You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Role of systematic reviews in detecting plagiarism: case of Asim Kurjak
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, September 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.38968.611296.f7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Iain Chalmers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 28% |
| Unknown | 5 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 37% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,202,267
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#19,603
of 64,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,449
of 87,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#36
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.