You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Operationalizing Network Theory for Ecosystem Service Assessments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura E. Dee, Stefano Allesina, Aletta Bonn, Anna Eklöf, Steven D. Gaines, Jes Hines, Ute Jacob, Eve McDonald-Madden, Hugh Possingham, Matthias Schröter, Ross M. Thompson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 14% |
| Germany | 9 | 14% |
| United States | 7 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 25 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 58% |
| Scientists | 22 | 34% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 481 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 467 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 123 | 26% |
| Researcher | 92 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 21 | 4% |
| Other | 70 | 15% |
| Unknown | 95 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 156 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 106 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Engineering | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 8% |
| Unknown | 136 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,062,113
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#649
of 3,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,896
of 316,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#10
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.