↓ Skip to main content

A case of Kawasaki disease initially diagnosed as septic shock

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A case of Kawasaki disease initially diagnosed as septic shock
Published in
Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine, January 2012
DOI 10.3918/jsicm.19.405
Authors

Nao Umei, Kazuaki Atagi, Hideki Shimaoka, Yuki Kinishi, Takenori Suga, Yasuyoshi Otsuka, Atsushi Uziro

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2016.
All research outputs
#14,413,270
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,920
of 252,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.