↓ Skip to main content

Use of peat-based sorbents for removal of arsenic compounds

Overview of attention for article published in Central European Journal of Chemistry, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Use of peat-based sorbents for removal of arsenic compounds
Published in
Central European Journal of Chemistry, March 2013
DOI 10.2478/s11532-013-0229-0
Authors

Linda Ansone, Maris Klavins, Linda Eglite

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Master 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 4 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 16%
Engineering 2 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2013.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Central European Journal of Chemistry
#436
of 462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,790
of 210,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Central European Journal of Chemistry
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 462 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.