| Title |
Robotic‐assisted Colorectal Surgery in the United States: A Nationwide Analysis of Trends and Outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-013-2024-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wissam J. Halabi, Celeste Y. Kang, Mehraneh D. Jafari, Vinh Q. Nguyen, Joseph C. Carmichael, Steven Mills, Michael J. Stamos, Alessio Pigazzi |
| Abstract |
While robotic-assisted colorectal surgery (RACS) is becoming increasingly popular, data comparing its outcomes to other established techniques remain limited to small case series. Moreover, there are no large studies evaluating the trends of RACS at the national level. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 58% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Morocco | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 18 | 24% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 55% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2015.
All research outputs
#5,005,512
of 24,653,581 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#803
of 4,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,209
of 203,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#9
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,653,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.