↓ Skip to main content

Germline transformation of the spotted wing drosophilid, Drosophila suzukii, with a piggyBac transposon vector

Overview of attention for article published in Genetica, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 720)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Germline transformation of the spotted wing drosophilid, Drosophila suzukii, with a piggyBac transposon vector
Published in
Genetica, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10709-013-9717-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc F. Schetelig, Alfred M. Handler

Abstract

Drosophila suzukii is a pest of small fruits in many parts of the world, whose management is limited to cultural practices and the use of insecticides. Here we describe a method to genetically manipulate this species in the first step to create female lethality strains useful for the sterile insect technique method of population suppression. This was achieved by the germ-line transformation of D. suzukii with a piggyBac transposon vector having a female-specific lethality effector construct. This can be used in a tetracycline-suppressible conditional gene expression system, when crossed to a suitable tet-transactivator strain. Transformation occurred efficiently, at a frequency of 16 % per fertile G0 embryo injected with vector and helper transposase plasmids. The vector was marked for transformant selection with the polyubiquitin-regulated EGFP fluorescent protein, and contains the attP landing site and heterospecific lox recombination sites for post-integration modification of the transgene vector. The 3xP3-AmCyan fluorescent protein marker was inserted within the lox sites to follow a possible recombinase-mediated cassette exchange, that would allow subsequent improvement of the transgenic strain by immobilization of the vector and introduction of new marker cassettes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
France 1 1%
Unknown 80 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 23%
Researcher 18 22%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 14%
Unspecified 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 15 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,342,296
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Genetica
#27
of 720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,999
of 201,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 720 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them