↓ Skip to main content

The HIV treatment cascade and care continuum: updates, goals, and recommendations for the future

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS Research and Therapy, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
217 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
368 Mendeley
Title
The HIV treatment cascade and care continuum: updates, goals, and recommendations for the future
Published in
AIDS Research and Therapy, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12981-016-0120-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Sophia Kay, D. Scott Batey, Michael J. Mugavero

Abstract

The HIV care continuum is a framework that models the dynamic stages of HIV care. The continuum consists of five main steps, which, at the population level, are depicted cross-sectionally as the HIV treatment cascade. These steps include diagnosis, linkage to care (LTC), retention in care (RiC), adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART), and viral suppression. Although the HIV treatment cascade is represented as a linear, unidirectional framework, persons living with HIV (PLWH) often experience the care continuum in a less streamlined fashion, skip steps altogether, or even exit the continuum for a period of time and regress to an earlier stage. The proportion of PLWH decreases at each successive step of the cascade, beginning with an estimated 86% who are diagnosed and dropping dramatically to approximately 30% of PLWH who are virally suppressed in the United States (US). In this current issues review, we describe each step in the cascade, discuss targeted interventions that address weak points in the continuum, review domestic and international policies that help shape and direct HIV care strategies, and conclude with recommendations and future directions for HIV providers and policymakers. While we primarily examine issues related to domestic HIV care in the US, we also discuss international applications of the continuum in order to provide broader context.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 367 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 15%
Researcher 54 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Other 22 6%
Other 71 19%
Unknown 86 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 14%
Social Sciences 50 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Psychology 8 2%
Other 50 14%
Unknown 95 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2019.
All research outputs
#5,217,934
of 25,109,675 outputs
Outputs from AIDS Research and Therapy
#153
of 631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,119
of 319,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS Research and Therapy
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,109,675 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.