↓ Skip to main content

Propositional epistemic luck, epistemic risk, and epistemic justification

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Propositional epistemic luck, epistemic risk, and epistemic justification
Published in
Synthese, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11229-016-1262-2
Authors

Patrick Bondy, Duncan Pritchard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 20%
Researcher 1 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 7 70%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2016.
All research outputs
#14,870,535
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#1,453
of 2,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,154
of 312,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#23
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.