Title |
A new early cretaceous dinosaur track assemblage and the first definite non-avian theropod swim trackway from China
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science Bulletin, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11434-013-5802-6 |
Authors |
LiDa Xing, Martin G. Lockley, JianPing Zhang, Andrew R. C. Milner, Hendrik Klein, DaQing Li, W. Scott Persons, JieFang Ebi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 26 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 7 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 37% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 19% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2016.
All research outputs
#6,753,656
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Science Bulletin
#604
of 1,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,335
of 212,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Bulletin
#13
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.