| Title |
Mindfulness: a systematic review of instruments to measure an emergent patient-reported outcome (PRO)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quality of Life Research, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11136-013-0395-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Taehwan Park, Maryanne Reilly-Spong, Cynthia R. Gross |
| Abstract |
Mindfulness has emerged as an important health concept based on evidence that mindfulness interventions reduce symptoms and improve health-related quality of life. The objectives of this study were to systematically assess and compare the properties of instruments to measure self-reported mindfulness. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 27% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 558 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 540 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 90 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 88 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 62 | 11% |
| Researcher | 56 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 51 | 9% |
| Other | 109 | 20% |
| Unknown | 102 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 228 | 41% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 38 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 19 | 3% |
| Other | 69 | 12% |
| Unknown | 130 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,773,653
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#202
of 3,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,403
of 212,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.