↓ Skip to main content

Relationships between fat and bone

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
388 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
Title
Relationships between fat and bone
Published in
Osteoporosis International, October 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00198-007-0492-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

I. R. Reid

Abstract

Body weight impacts both bone turnover and bone density, making it, therefore, an important risk factor for vertebral and hip fractures and ranking it alongside age in importance. The effect of body weight is probably contributed to by both fat mass and lean mass, though in postmenopausal women, fat mass has been more consistently demonstrated to be important. A number of mechanisms for the fat-bone relationship exist and include the effect of soft tissue mass on skeletal loading, the association of fat mass with the secretion of bone active hormones from the pancreatic beta cell (including insulin, amylin, and preptin), and the secretion of bone active hormones (e.g., estrogens and leptin) from the adipocyte. These factors alone probably do not fully explain the observed clinical associations, and study of the actions on bone of novel hormones related to nutrition is an important area of further research. An understanding of this aspect of bone biology may open the way for new treatments of osteoporosis. More immediately, the role of weight maintenance in the prevention of osteoporosis is an important public health message that needs to be more widely appreciated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Spain 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Lebanon 1 <1%
Unknown 179 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 21%
Researcher 30 16%
Student > Master 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 41 22%
Unknown 23 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Engineering 7 4%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 36 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2022.
All research outputs
#5,517,069
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#916
of 3,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,791
of 92,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.