| Title |
Using Dung to Estimate Gorilla Density: Modeling Dung Production Rate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Primatology, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10764-008-9247-8 |
| Authors |
Angelique F. Todd, Hjalmar S. Kuehl, Chloé Cipolletta, Peter D. Walsh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 21% |
| Researcher | 22 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 24% |
| Unknown | 7 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 55% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2016.
All research outputs
#3,291,328
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Primatology
#239
of 1,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,873
of 82,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Primatology
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.