| Title |
Phylogenetic Analysis of Viroid and Viroid-Like Satellite RNAs from Plants: A Reassessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Molecular Evolution, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s002390010203 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Santiago F. Elena, Joaquín Dopazo, Marcos de la Peña, Ricardo Flores, Theodor O. Diener, Andrés Moya |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Croatia | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 14% |
| Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 57% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 27% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,959,936
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#119
of 1,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,879
of 308,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.