You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measurement of tectonic surface uplift rate in a young collisional mountain belt
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, February 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1038/385501a0 |
| Authors |
Lon D. Abbott, Eli A. Silver, Robert S. Anderson, Randall Smith, James C. Ingle, Stanley A. Kling, David Haig, Eric Small, Joseph Galewsky, William S. Sliter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 22% |
| Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 59 | 68% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2008.
All research outputs
#4,675,396
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#55,395
of 90,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,217
of 91,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#86
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.