↓ Skip to main content

Reply to My Critics: A Response to Reviews of Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution

Overview of attention for article published in Biology & Philosophy, November 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 661)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Reply to My Critics: A Response to Reviews of Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution
Published in
Biology & Philosophy, November 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1012268700496
Authors

Michael J. Behe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
Portugal 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 82 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Professor 4 4%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 47 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 14%
Philosophy 12 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 50 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,156,368
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#29
of 661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#815
of 44,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them