| Title |
Darwin’s legacy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theory in Biosciences, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12064-010-0098-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nathalie Gontier |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 34% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 20% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 22% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 51% |
| Philosophy | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2010.
All research outputs
#5,846,018
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Theory in Biosciences
#44
of 194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,867
of 95,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory in Biosciences
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.