| Title |
Links between maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony under a simple model of site substitution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, May 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02459467 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chris Tuffley, Mike Steel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 4% |
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Argentina | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 137 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 40 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 29 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 98 | 61% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,308,718
of 23,523,017 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#95
of 1,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,000
of 30,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,523,017 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,115 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them