| Title |
A model of blood flow in the mesenteric arterial system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, May 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-925x-6-17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thusitha DS Mabotuwana, Leo K Cheng, Andrew J Pullan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 2% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 27% |
| Researcher | 14 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 5 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 20 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 11% |
| Mathematics | 5 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,492,173
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#207
of 822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,348
of 72,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 822 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them