↓ Skip to main content

High adaptive variability and virus-driven selection on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes in invasive wild rabbits in Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
High adaptive variability and virus-driven selection on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes in invasive wild rabbits in Australia
Published in
Biological Invasions, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10530-016-1329-5
Authors

Nina Schwensow, Camila J. Mazzoni, Elena Marmesat, Joerns Fickel, David Peacock, John Kovaliski, Ron Sinclair, Phillip Cassey, Brian Cooke, Simone Sommer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 24%
Researcher 11 24%
Student > Master 9 20%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 20%
Environmental Science 4 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2016.
All research outputs
#13,487,741
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#1,621
of 2,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,571
of 307,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#41
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.