↓ Skip to main content

Australia's Dengue Risk Driven by Human Adaptation to Climate Change

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
175 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
276 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Australia's Dengue Risk Driven by Human Adaptation to Climate Change
Published in
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, May 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000429
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nigel W. Beebe, Robert D. Cooper, Pipi Mottram, Anthony W. Sweeney

Abstract

The reduced rainfall in southeast Australia has placed this region's urban and rural communities on escalating water restrictions, with anthropogenic climate change forecasts suggesting that this drying trend will continue. To mitigate the stress this may place on domestic water supply, governments have encouraged the installation of large domestic water tanks in towns and cities throughout this region. These prospective stable mosquito larval sites create the possibility of the reintroduction of Ae. aegypti from Queensland, where it remains endemic, back into New South Wales and other populated centres in Australia, along with the associated emerging and re-emerging dengue risk if the virus was to be introduced.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Germany 3 1%
Australia 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
French Polynesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 259 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 64 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 14%
Student > Master 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 31 11%
Other 18 7%
Other 53 19%
Unknown 38 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 29%
Environmental Science 38 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 12%
Social Sciences 20 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 3%
Other 47 17%
Unknown 49 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2018.
All research outputs
#647,745
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#324
of 9,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,427
of 103,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#2
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.