↓ Skip to main content

A novel retractable laparoscopic device for mapping gastrointestinal slow wave propagation patterns

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
A novel retractable laparoscopic device for mapping gastrointestinal slow wave propagation patterns
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00464-016-4936-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel Berry, Niranchan Paskaranandavadivel, Peng Du, Mark L. Trew, Gregory O’Grady, John A. Windsor, Leo K. Cheng

Abstract

Gastric slow waves regulate peristalsis, and gastric dysrhythmias have been implicated in functional motility disorders. To accurately define slow wave patterns, it is currently necessary to collect high-resolution serosal recordings during open surgery. We therefore developed a novel gastric slow wave mapping device for use during laparoscopic procedures. The device consists of a retractable catheter constructed of a flexible nitinol core coated with Pebax. Once deployed through a 5-mm laparoscopic port, the spiral head is revealed with 32 electrodes at 5 mm intervals. Recordings were validated against a reference electrode array in pigs and tested in a human patient. Recordings from the device and a reference array in pigs were identical in frequency (2.6 cycles per minute; p = 0.91), and activation patterns and velocities were consistent (8.9 ± 0.2 vs 8.7 ± 0.1 mm s(-1); p = 0.2). Device and reference amplitudes were comparable (1.3 ± 0.1 vs 1.4 ± 0.1 mV; p = 0.4), though the device signal-to-noise ratio was higher (17.5 ± 0.6 vs 12.8 ± 0.6 dB; P < 0.0001). In the human patient, corpus slow waves were recorded and mapped (frequency 2.7 ± 0.03 cycles per minute, amplitude 0.8 ± 0.4 mV, velocity 2.3 ± 0.9 mm s(-1)). In conclusion, the novel laparoscopic device achieves high-quality serosal slow wave recordings. It can be used for laparoscopic diagnostic studies to document slow wave patterns in patients with gastric motility disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Librarian 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 15 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 15%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2017.
All research outputs
#12,678,879
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#2,484
of 6,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,885
of 299,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#42
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,066 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.