You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Are wolves saving Yellowstone's aspen? A landscape‐level test of a behaviorally mediated trophic cascade
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1890/09-1949.1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew J. Kauffman, Jedediah F. Brodie, Erik S. Jules |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 40% |
| Colombia | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 575 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 4% |
| France | 5 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 529 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 132 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 99 | 17% |
| Researcher | 95 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 80 | 14% |
| Professor | 21 | 4% |
| Other | 66 | 11% |
| Unknown | 82 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 291 | 51% |
| Environmental Science | 128 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 27 | 5% |
| Unknown | 100 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#534,474
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#187
of 7,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,340
of 108,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#3
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.