↓ Skip to main content

Low-Fat Dietary Pattern and Cancer Incidence in the Women’s Health Initiative Dietary Modification Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
12 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
182 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low-Fat Dietary Pattern and Cancer Incidence in the Women’s Health Initiative Dietary Modification Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, October 2007
DOI 10.1093/jnci/djm159
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ross L. Prentice, Cynthia A. Thomson, Bette Caan, F. Allan Hubbell, Garnet L. Anderson, Shirley A. A. Beresford, Mary Pettinger, Dorothy S. Lane, Lawrence Lessin, Shagufta Yasmeen, Baljinder Singh, Janardan Khandekar, James M. Shikany, Suzanne Satterfield, Rowan T. Chlebowski

Abstract

The Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification (DM) Randomized Controlled Trial evaluated the effects of a low-fat dietary pattern on chronic disease incidence, with breast cancer and colorectal cancer as primary outcomes. The trial protocol also listed ovarian cancer and endometrial cancer as outcomes that may be favorably affected by the intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 121 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 16%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Other 11 8%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 33 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2017.
All research outputs
#825,516
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#527
of 7,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,305
of 83,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#2
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.