You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Low-Fat Dietary Pattern and Cancer Incidence in the Women’s Health Initiative Dietary Modification Randomized Controlled Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, October 2007
|
DOI | 10.1093/jnci/djm159 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ross L. Prentice, Cynthia A. Thomson, Bette Caan, F. Allan Hubbell, Garnet L. Anderson, Shirley A. A. Beresford, Mary Pettinger, Dorothy S. Lane, Lawrence Lessin, Shagufta Yasmeen, Baljinder Singh, Janardan Khandekar, James M. Shikany, Suzanne Satterfield, Rowan T. Chlebowski |
Abstract |
The Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification (DM) Randomized Controlled Trial evaluated the effects of a low-fat dietary pattern on chronic disease incidence, with breast cancer and colorectal cancer as primary outcomes. The trial protocol also listed ovarian cancer and endometrial cancer as outcomes that may be favorably affected by the intervention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 25% |
Australia | 1 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Canada | 1 | 8% |
Ireland | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 121 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
Researcher | 18 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
Other | 11 | 8% |
Other | 24 | 18% |
Unknown | 24 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 28% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 7% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 12% |
Unknown | 33 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2017.
All research outputs
#825,516
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#527
of 7,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,305
of 83,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#2
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.