You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome Project Standards in a New Era of Sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.1180614 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
P. S. G. Chain, D. V. Grafham, R. S. Fulton, M. G. FitzGerald, J. Hostetler, D. Muzny, J. Ali, B. Birren, D. C. Bruce, C. Buhay, J. R. Cole, Y. Ding, S. Dugan, D. Field, G. M. Garrity, R. Gibbs, T. Graves, C. S. Han, S. H. Harrison, S. Highlander, P. Hugenholtz, H. M. Khouri, C. D. Kodira, E. Kolker, N. C. Kyrpides, D. Lang, A. Lapidus, S. A. Malfatti, V. Markowitz, T. Metha, K. E. Nelson, J. Parkhill, S. Pitluck, X. Qin, T. D. Read, J. Schmutz, S. Sozhamannan, P. Sterk, R. L. Strausberg, G. Sutton, N. R. Thomson, J. M. Tiedje, G. Weinstock, A. Wollam, Genomic Standards Consortium Human Microbiome Project Jumpstart Consortium, J. C. Detter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 38% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Norway | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 63% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 409 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 3% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Denmark | 3 | <1% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 2% |
| Unknown | 343 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 111 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 83 | 20% |
| Unknown | 25 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 221 | 54% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 67 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 21 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 41 | 10% |
| Unknown | 34 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2018.
All research outputs
#2,066,355
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Science
#28,466
of 83,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,529
of 110,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#134
of 377 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 377 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.