You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence of Rickettsia spp. in Ticks and Serological and Clinical Outcomes in Tick-Bitten Individuals in Sweden and on the Åland Islands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0166653 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anders Lindblom, Katarina Wallménius, Johanna Sjöwall, Linda Fryland, Peter Wilhelmsson, Per-Eric Lindgren, Pia Forsberg, Kenneth Nilsson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Norway | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 17% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2016.
All research outputs
#3,525,716
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#46,375
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,558
of 316,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#820
of 3,966 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,966 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.