↓ Skip to main content

Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility as a means for insect pest population control

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
patent
4 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
331 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
465 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility as a means for insect pest population control
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2004
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0403853101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sofia Zabalou, Markus Riegler, Marianna Theodorakopoulou, Christian Stauffer, Charalambos Savakis, Kostas Bourtzis

Abstract

Biological control is the purposeful introduction of parasites, predators, and pathogens to reduce or suppress pest populations. Wolbachia are inherited bacteria of arthropods that have recently attracted attention for their potential as new biocontrol agents. Wolbachia manipulate host reproduction by using several strategies, one of which is cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) [Stouthamer, R., Breeuwer, J. A. J. & Hurst, G. D. D. (1999) Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 53, 71-102]. We established Wolbachia-infected lines of the medfly Ceratitis capitata using the infected cherry fruit fly Rhagoletis cerasi as donor. Wolbachia induced complete CI in the novel host. Laboratory cage populations were completely suppressed by single releases of infected males, suggesting that Wolbachia-induced CI could be used as a novel environmentally friendly tool for the control of medfly populations. The results also encourage the introduction of Wolbachia into pest and vector species of economic and hygenic relevance to suppress or modify natural populations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 465 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 439 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 99 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 95 20%
Student > Bachelor 56 12%
Student > Master 53 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 5%
Other 74 16%
Unknown 65 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 250 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 71 15%
Environmental Science 18 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 1%
Other 28 6%
Unknown 81 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2023.
All research outputs
#396,813
of 25,002,811 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#7,150
of 102,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#366
of 74,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#13
of 478 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,002,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 478 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.