↓ Skip to main content

How do hospital inpatients conceptualise patient safety? A qualitative interview study using constructivist grounded theory

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Quality & Safety, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
79 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How do hospital inpatients conceptualise patient safety? A qualitative interview study using constructivist grounded theory
Published in
BMJ Quality & Safety, October 2022
DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-014695
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily Barrow, Rachael A Lear, Abigail Morbi, Susannah Long, Ara Darzi, Erik Mayer, Stephanie Archer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 18%
Researcher 2 9%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 10 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 18%
Psychology 2 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2023.
All research outputs
#823,292
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#309
of 2,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,106
of 441,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.