Title |
Transvaginal endoscopic appendectomy in humans: a unique approach to NOTES—world’s first report
|
---|---|
Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, March 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00464-008-9811-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chinnusamy Palanivelu, Pidigu Seshiyer Rajan, Muthukumaran Rangarajan, Ramakrishnan Parthasarathi, Palanisamy Senthilnathan, Mohan Prasad |
Abstract |
Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is the newest technique emerging in the field of surgery. There are several techniques described in the literature; however there is no standardization yet. We describe the transvaginal approach for endoscopic appendectomy in humans, probably the world's first report. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 26 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 21% |
Professor | 4 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 21% |
Unknown | 4 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 48% |
Engineering | 5 | 17% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,671,343
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#520
of 6,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,591
of 81,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,003 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.