| Title |
Communication Disruption of Guava Moth (Coscinoptycha improbana) Using a Pheromone Analog Based on Chain Length
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Chemical Ecology, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10886-013-0339-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. M. Suckling, J. J. Dymock, K. C. Park, R. H. Wakelin, L. E. Jamieson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 33% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 20% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 60% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 20% |
| Psychology | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2017.
All research outputs
#4,722,996
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#301
of 2,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,807
of 197,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.