↓ Skip to main content

Overview of Modern Management of Patients with Critical Injury and Severe Sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Overview of Modern Management of Patients with Critical Injury and Severe Sepsis
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s002689910107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen J. Streat, Lindsay D. Plank, Graham L. Hill

Abstract

Over the last 10 years there have been substantial changes in the issues confronting intensivists and surgeons caring for critically ill patients. A substantial increase in the number of elderly patients with surgical illness and complex co-morbidity has accompanied the increase in the proportion of elderly in populations in the developed world. This phenomenon has been seen particularly with sepsis. Incidence rates for blunt trauma have declined overall, but the problems of the elderly trauma patient have become more evident. Major elective surgery remains a common indication for short-term intensive care in many countries, but the need for cost-containment has led to increased use of high-dependency care for many such patients. Expectations of both society and clinicians have increased, and this has been reflected in the increased demand for complex procedures (e.g., liver transplantation, cerebral artery aneurysm clipping, aortic aneurysm repair) in patients previously considered at too high risk. Along with these expectations have come pressures on clinicians to reduce costs at the same time as improving clinical outcomes. Despite many advances in the care of critically ill patients with injury or sepsis, mortality, morbidity, and cost remain high; and nutritional support is frequently required. The duration and extent of the metabolic changes seen in response to critical surgical illness and intensive care treatments have become better characterized. Although some of the changes in body water and fat are modifiable, loss of large amounts of (functional) protein has been resistant to various strategies so far studied.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 5%
South Africa 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 37 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 20%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 11 27%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 66%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 5 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2012.
All research outputs
#7,492,173
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#1,505
of 4,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,166
of 314,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#23
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.