| Title |
Simulating a neural cross-talk model for between-hand interference during bimanual circle drawing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Cybernetics, October 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s004220050567 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. Cattaert, A. Semjen, J. J. Summers |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 25% |
| Researcher | 19 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 10 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 18 | 20% |
| Psychology | 15 | 17% |
| Engineering | 13 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2010.
All research outputs
#4,546,934
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#81
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,862
of 35,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.