↓ Skip to main content

The human amygdala in social judgment

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, June 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1054 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
503 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The human amygdala in social judgment
Published in
Nature, June 1998
DOI 10.1038/30982
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ralph Adolphs, Daniel Tranel, Antonio R. Damasio

Abstract

Studies in animals have implicated the amygdala in emotional and social behaviours, especially those related to fear and aggression. Although lesion and functional imaging studies in humans have demonstrated the amygdala's participation in recognizing emotional facial expressions, its role in human social behaviour has remained unclear. We report here our investigation into the hypothesis that the human amygdala is required for accurate social judgments of other individuals on the basis of their facial appearance. We asked three subjects with complete bilateral amygdala damage to judge faces of unfamiliar people with respect to two attributes important in real-life social encounters: approachability and trustworthiness. All three subjects judged unfamiliar individuals to be more approachable and more trustworthy than did control subjects. The impairment was most striking for faces to which normal subjects assign the most negative ratings: unapproachable and untrustworthy looking individuals. Additional investigations revealed that the impairment does not extend to judging verbal descriptions of people. The amygdala appears to be an important component of the neural systems that help retrieve socially relevant knowledge on the basis of facial appearance.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 503 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 7 1%
Unknown 471 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 18%
Researcher 83 17%
Student > Bachelor 64 13%
Student > Master 54 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 7%
Other 100 20%
Unknown 75 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 194 39%
Neuroscience 64 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 49 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 9%
Social Sciences 16 3%
Other 44 9%
Unknown 92 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#740,752
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#27,073
of 91,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247
of 34,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#11
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 100.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.