↓ Skip to main content

Growth rings in tropical trees: role of functional traits, environment, and phylogeny

Overview of attention for article published in Trees, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Growth rings in tropical trees: role of functional traits, environment, and phylogeny
Published in
Trees, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00468-016-1442-1
Authors

Cheryl D. Nath, François Munoz, Raphaël Pélissier, David F. R. P. Burslem, G. Muthusankar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 101 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 21%
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 17 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 35%
Environmental Science 25 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 5%
Engineering 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 28 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2016.
All research outputs
#14,900,673
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Trees
#245
of 562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,590
of 368,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trees
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 562 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.