↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of soil fungal communities using pyrosequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Microbiology, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of soil fungal communities using pyrosequencing
Published in
Journal of Microbiology, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12275-010-9369-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Young Woon Lim, Byung Kwon Kim, Changmu Kim, Hack Sung Jung, Bong-Soo Kim, Jae-Hak Lee, Jongsik Chun

Abstract

Pyrosequencing, a non-electrophoretic method of DNA sequencing, was used to investigate the extensive fungal community in soils of three islands in the Yellow Sea of Korea, between Korea and China. Pyrosequencing was carried out on amplicons derived from the 5' region of 18S rDNA. A total of 10,166 reads were obtained, with an average length of 103 bp. The maximum number of fungal phylotypes in soil predicted at 99% similarity was 3,334. The maximum numbers of phylotypes predicted at 97% and 95% similarities were 736 and 286, respectively. Through phylogenetic assignment using BLASTN, a total of 372 tentative taxa were identified. The majority of true fungal sequences recovered in this study belonged to the Ascomycota (182 tentative taxa in 2,708 reads) and Basidiomycota (172 tentative taxa in 6,837 reads). The predominant species of Ascomycota detected have been described as lichen-forming fungi, litter/wood decomposers, plant parasites, endophytes, and saprotrophs: Peltigera neopolydactyla (Lecanoromycetes), Paecilomyces sp. (Sordariomycetes), Phacopsis huuskonenii (Lecanoromycetes), and Raffaelea hennebertii (mitosporicAscomycota). The majority of sequences in the Basidiomycota matched ectomycorrhizal and wood rotting fungi, including species of the Agaricales and Aphyllophorales, respectively. A high number of sequences in the Thelephorales, Boletales, Stereales, Hymenochaetales, and Ceratobasidiomycetes were also detected. By applying high-throughput pyrosequencing, we observed a high diversity of soil fungi and found evidence that pyrosequencing is a reliable technique for investigating fungal communities in soils.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 191 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 56 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 21%
Student > Master 16 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 6%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Other 42 21%
Unknown 20 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 137 68%
Environmental Science 26 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Chemistry 3 1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 23 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2010.
All research outputs
#5,966,916
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Microbiology
#113
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,293
of 96,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Microbiology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.