↓ Skip to main content

Home-based isometric exercise training induced reductions resting blood pressure

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
Title
Home-based isometric exercise training induced reductions resting blood pressure
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00421-016-3501-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan D. Wiles, Natalie Goldring, Damian Coleman

Abstract

Isometric exercise training (IET) reduces resting blood pressure (BP). Most previous protocols impose exercise barriers which undermine its effectiveness as a potential physical therapy for altering BP. An inexpensive, home-based programme would promote IET as a valuable tool in the fight against hypertension. The aims of this study were: (a) to investigate whether home-based wall squat training could successfully reduce resting BP and (b) to explore the physiological variables that might mediate a change in resting BP. Twenty-eight healthy normotensive males were randomly assigned to a control and a 4 week home-based IET intervention using a crossover design with a 4 week 'washout' period in-between. Wall squat training was completed 3 × weekly over 4 weeks with 48 h between sessions. Each session comprised 4 × 2 min bouts of wall squat exercise performed at a participant-specific knee joint angle relative to a target HR of 95% HRpeak, with 2 min rest between bouts. Resting heart rate, BP, cardiac output, total peripheral resistance, and stroke volume were taken at baseline and post each condition. Resting BP (systolic -4 ± 5, diastolic -3 ± 3 and mean arterial -3 ± 3 mmHg), cardiac output (-0.54 ± 0.66 L min(-1)) and heart rate (-5 ± 7 beats min(-1)) were all reduced following IET, with no change in total peripheral resistance or stroke volume compared to the control. These findings suggest that the wall squat provides an effective method for reducing resting BP in the home resulting primarily from a reduction in resting heart rate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 250 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 13%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 7%
Student > Postgraduate 9 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 125 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 34 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 10%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Psychology 6 2%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 132 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,585,791
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,061
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,542
of 288,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#11
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.