↓ Skip to main content

The cost of serially chaining two cognitive operations

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Research, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The cost of serially chaining two cognitive operations
Published in
Psychological Research, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00426-011-0375-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhao Fan, Krish Singh, Suresh Muthukumaraswamy, Mariano Sigman, Stanislas Dehaene, Kimron Shapiro

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 35 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 26%
Researcher 8 21%
Student > Master 7 18%
Professor 6 16%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 45%
Neuroscience 6 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,492,173
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Research
#287
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,334
of 124,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Research
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.