↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines for Submitting Adverse Event Reports for Publication

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Safety, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Guidelines for Submitting Adverse Event Reports for Publication
Published in
Drug Safety, October 2012
DOI 10.2165/00002018-200730050-00001
Pubmed ID
Authors

William N. Kelly, Felix M. Arellano, Joanne Barnes, Ulf Bergman, Ralph I. Edwards, Alina M. Fernandez, Stephen B. Freedman, David I. Goldsmith, Kui A. Huang, Judith K. Jones, Rachel McLeay, Nicholas Moore, Rosie H. Stather, Thierry Trenque, William G. Troutman, Eugene van Puijenbroek, Frank Williams, Robert P. Wise

Abstract

Publication of case reports describing suspected adverse effects of drugs and medical products that include herbal and complementary medicines, vaccines, and other biologicals and devices is important for postmarketing surveillance. Publication lends credence to important signals raised in these adverse event reports. Unfortunately, deficiencies in vital information in published cases can often limit the value of such reports by failing to provide enough details for either (i) a differential diagnosis or provisional assessment of cause-effect association, or (ii) a reasonable pharmacological or biological explanation. Properly described, a published report of one or more adverse events can provide a useful signal of possible risks associated with the use of a drug or medical product which might warrant further exploration. A review conducted by the Task Force authors found that many major journals have minimal requirements for publishing adverse event reports, and some have none at all. Based on a literature review and our collective experience in reviewing adverse event case reports in regulatory, academic, and industry settings, we have identified information that we propose should always be considered for inclusion in a report submitted for publication. These guidelines have been endorsed by the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE) and the International Society of Pharmacovigilance (ISoP) and are freely available on the societies' websites. Their widespread distribution is encouraged. ISPE and ISoP urge biomedical journals to adopt these guidelines and apply them to case reports submitted for publication. They also encourage schools of medicine, pharmacy, and nursing to incorporate them into the relevant curricula that address the detection, evaluation, and reporting of suspected drug or other medical product adverse events.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 18%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 14%
Philosophy 1 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 7 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2018.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Drug Safety
#1,534
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,424
of 194,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Safety
#688
of 764 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 764 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.