↓ Skip to main content

A seasonal natural history of the ant, Odontomachus brunneus

Overview of attention for article published in Insectes Sociaux, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
A seasonal natural history of the ant, Odontomachus brunneus
Published in
Insectes Sociaux, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00040-011-0186-6
Authors

L. M. Hart, W. R. Tschinkel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 28%
Student > Master 12 26%
Other 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Professor 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 60%
Environmental Science 8 17%
Unspecified 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,449,543
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Insectes Sociaux
#71
of 962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,314
of 119,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insectes Sociaux
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them