You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Characterizing the evolution of genetic variance using genetic covariance tensors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rstb.2008.0313 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma Hine, Stephen F. Chenoweth, Howard D. Rundle, Mark W. Blows |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 29% |
| Researcher | 42 | 26% |
| Professor | 11 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 19% |
| Unknown | 12 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 103 | 63% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2017.
All research outputs
#4,315,232
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#2,996
of 7,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,516
of 125,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#53
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.