You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of the mineral composition of the sediment found in two Mars dunefields: Ogygis Undae and Gale crater – three distinct endmembers identified
|
---|---|
Published in |
Earth & Planetary Science Letters, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.10.022 |
Authors |
Heather Charles, Timothy Titus, Rosalyn Hayward, Christopher Edwards, Caitlin Ahrens |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 33% |
Chile | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
Researcher | 3 | 21% |
Librarian | 1 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 57% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
Chemistry | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,229,156
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#1,141
of 5,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,623
of 421,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#32
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.