| Title |
Conditioned responding to magnetic fields by honeybees
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, January 1985
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00611096 |
| Authors |
Michael M. Walker, M. E. Bitterman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 55% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2019.
All research outputs
#359,003
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#7
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62
of 39,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.