↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of Risk and Resilience in Military Families: Theoretical and Empirical Basis of a Family-Focused Resilience Enhancement Program

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 393)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
166 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
366 Mendeley
Title
Mechanisms of Risk and Resilience in Military Families: Theoretical and Empirical Basis of a Family-Focused Resilience Enhancement Program
Published in
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10567-011-0096-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

William R. Saltzman, Patricia Lester, William R. Beardslee, Christopher M. Layne, Kirsten Woodward, William P. Nash

Abstract

Recent studies have confirmed that repeated wartime deployment of a parent exacts a toll on military children and families and that the quality and functionality of familial relations is linked to force preservation and readiness. As a result, family-centered care has increasingly become a priority across the military health system. FOCUS (Families OverComing Under Stress), a family-centered, resilience-enhancing program developed by a team at UCLA and Harvard Schools of Medicine, is a primary initiative in this movement. In a large-scale implementation project initiated by the Bureau of Navy Medicine, FOCUS has been delivered to thousands of Navy, Marine, Navy Special Warfare, Army, and Air Force families since 2008. This article describes the theoretical and empirical foundation and rationale for FOCUS, which is rooted in a broad conception of family resilience. We review the literature on family resilience, noting that an important next step in building a clinically useful theory of family resilience is to move beyond developing broad "shopping lists" of risk indicators by proposing specific mechanisms of risk and resilience. Based on the literature, we propose five primary risk mechanisms for military families and common negative "chain reaction" pathways through which they undermine the resilience of families contending with wartime deployments and parental injury. In addition, we propose specific mechanisms that mobilize and enhance resilience in military families and that comprise central features of the FOCUS Program. We describe these resilience-enhancing mechanisms in detail, followed by a discussion of the ways in which evaluation data from the program's first 2 years of operation supports the proposed model and the specified mechanisms of action.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 366 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 3%
Portugal 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 346 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 54 15%
Researcher 46 13%
Student > Master 46 13%
Student > Bachelor 29 8%
Other 64 17%
Unknown 65 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 119 33%
Social Sciences 81 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 3%
Other 37 10%
Unknown 70 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2019.
All research outputs
#909,740
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#42
of 393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,313
of 116,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.