Title |
Enriching the Notion of Data Curation in E-Science: Data Managing and Information Infrastructuring in the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network
|
---|---|
Published in |
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), August 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10606-006-9023-2 |
Authors |
Helena Karasti, Karen S. Baker, Eija Halkola |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 20 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
Germany | 3 | 1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 175 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 23% |
Researcher | 32 | 15% |
Librarian | 28 | 13% |
Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
Other | 48 | 23% |
Unknown | 15 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 72 | 35% |
Social Sciences | 54 | 26% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 12 | 6% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Other | 26 | 13% |
Unknown | 24 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2013.
All research outputs
#2,953,434
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
#20
of 265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,373
of 92,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them